Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction认知与多主体互动：从认知模型到社会模拟 mobi 下载 网盘 caj lrf pdf txt 阿里云

This book explores the intersection between cognitive sciences and social sciences。 In particular， it explores the intersection between individual cognitive modeling and modeling of multi-agent interaction （social stimulation）。 The two contributing fields--individual cognitive modeling （especially cognitive architectures） and modeling of multi-agent interaction （including social simulation and，to some extent，multi-agent systems）--have seen phenomenal growth in recent years。However，the interaction of these two fields has not been sufficiently developed。 We believe that the interaction of the two may be more significant than either alone。

This book explores the intersection betwen cognitive sciences and social sciences。 It explores the relation between the individual mind and the social processes through computational modeling and simulation of both。 The two sides bring with them enormous intellectual capitals。 These intellectual capitals can be profitably leveraged in creating true synergy between the two fields， leading to more in-depth studies and a better understanding of both individual cognition and sociocultural processes。

List of Contributors

Preface

PART1 INTRODUCTION

Prolegomena to Integrating Cognitive Modeling and Social Simulation

Ron Sun

PART2 OVERVIEWS OF COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES

Modeling Paradigms in ACT-R

Niels Taatgen

Christian Lebiere

John Anderson

Considering Soar as an Agent Architecture

Robert E. Wray

Randolph M. Jones

The CLARION Cognitive Architecture： Extending

Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation

Ron Sun

PART3 MODELING AND SIMULATING COGNITIVE AND SOCIAL PROCESSES

Cognitive Architectures, Game Playing, and Human Evolution

Robert L. West，Christian Lebiere，Dan J. Bothell

Simulating a Simple Case of Organizational

Decision Making

Isaac Naveh Ron Sun

Cognitive Modeling of Social Behaviors

William J. Clancey，Maarten Sierhuis，Bruce Damer，Boris Brodsky

Cognitive Agents Interacting in Real and Virtual Worlds

Bradley J. Best，Christian Lebiere

Modeling Social Emotions and Social Attributions

Jonathan Gratch，Wenji Mao，Stacy Marsella

Communicating and Collaborating with Robotic Agents

J. Gregory Trafton，Alan C. Schultz，Nicholas L. Cassimatis，Laura M. Hiatt，

Dennis Perzanowski，Derek P. Brock，Magdalena D. Bugajska，William Adams

Behavior-Based Methods for Modeling and Structuring Control of Social Robots

Dylan A. Shell，Maja J. Mataric

Evolution of a Teamwork Model

Nathan Schurr，Steven Okamoto，Rajiv T. Maheswaran，Paul Scerri，Milind Tambe

Sociality in Embodied Neural Agents

Domenico Parisi，Stefano Nolfi

Cognitive Architecture and Contents for Social

Structures and Interactions

Cristiano Castelfranchi

PART4 A SYMPOSIUM

Cognitive Science and Good Social Science

Scott Moss

Collective Cognition and Emergence in

Multi-Agent Systems

Pietro Panzarasa，Nicholas R. Jennings

Social Judgment in Multi-Agent Systems

Tom R. Burns，Ewa Roszkowska

Including Human Variability in a Cognitive

Architecture to Improve Team Simulation

Frank E. Ritter，Emma Norling

When Does Social Simulation Need Cognitive Models？

Nigel Gilbert

Index

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction认知与多主体互动：从认知模型到社会模拟在线阅读

在线听书地址：Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction认知与多主体互动：从认知模型到社会模拟在线收听

在线购买地址：Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction认知与多主体互动：从认知模型到社会模拟在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

This book explores the intersection between cognitive sciences and social sciences. In particular, it explores the intersection between individual cognitive modeling and modeling of multi-agent interaction (social stimulation). The two contributing fields--individual cognitive modeling (especially cognitive architectures) and modeling of multi-agent interaction (including social simulation and, to some extent, multi-agent systems)--have seen phenomenal growth in recent years. However, the interaction of these two fields has not been sufficiently developed. We believe that the interaction of the two may be more significant than either alone.